Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Championship Parade results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 4,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,548 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,698 of 16,562 topics). This Championship Parade is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Championship Parade
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos