Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Chavez Allegations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,160 hits. Analysis detected 8,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,880 of 15,690 topics). This Cesar Chavez Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Cesar Chavez Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 12,184
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos