Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Chavez results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,992 of 16,562 topics). This Cesar Chavez is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Cesar Chavez
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠28%Cesar Chavez (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos