Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ces results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 2,458 hits. Analysis detected 9,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,640 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,885 of 16,562 topics). This Ces is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Ces
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,640
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 28.4%28.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos