Topic summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 2,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Censorship In Schools results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 687 hits . Analysis detected 5,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,740 of 16,562 topics). This Censorship In Schools is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Censorship In Schools
Topic details
Total words: 6,027
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst