Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cell Phone Policy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 2,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,649 of 16,562 topics). This Cell Phone Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Cell Phone Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 28.6%28.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos