Topic summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cell Biology results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 115 hits . Analysis detected 819 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,290 of 16,562 topics). This Cell Biology is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Cell Biology
Topic details
Total words: 3,327
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst