Topic summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos1,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celestial Mechanics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Pessimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 3,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,949 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,458 of 16,562 topics). This Celestial Mechanics is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Celestial Mechanics
Topic details
Total words: 5,949
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos