Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Scandals results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,041 hits. Analysis detected 5,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,769 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,796 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Celebrity Scandals
Topic details
Total words: 3,769
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.9%15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.6%27.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos