Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Feuds results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 4,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,950 of 16,559 topics). This Celebrity Feuds is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Celebrity Feuds
Topic details
Total words: 5,396
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst