Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Fashion results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 3,768 hits. Analysis detected 10,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,140 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,412 of 15,344 topics). This Celebrity Fashion is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Celebrity Fashion
Topic details
Total words: 8,140
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 46.3%46.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.0%27.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 46.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos