Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Families results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 3,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,367 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Families is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Celebrity Families
Topic details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos