Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Endorsements results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 9,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,338 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Endorsements is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Celebrity Endorsements
Topic details
Total words: 6,948
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos