Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Death results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 4,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,566 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,095 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Death is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Celebrity Death
Topic details
Total words: 2,566
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 5.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 25.6% 25.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 28.8% 28.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst