Topic summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Accountability results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 1,091 hits . Analysis detected 6,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,645 of 15,388 topics). This Celebrity Accountability is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Celebrity Accountability
Topic details
Total words: 3,990
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 25.2% 25.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 27.3% 27.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst