Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrities results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,188 hits. Analysis detected 5,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (11,474 of 15,689 topics). This Celebrities is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Celebrities
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,996
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos