Ruby Rose reveals details of the night she alleges Katy Perry sexually assaulted her in a newspaper article over a decade ago ⁠42%

By Monique Friedlander⁠26%

4/17/2026, 6:32:57 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 750 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (12,465 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the article peer group.

An article written by Ruby Rose more than a decade ago has shed new light on the actress's claims Katy Perry sexually assaulted her at a nightclub in 2010. 
The essay, published by the Herald Sun in 2011, describes how an intoxicated Rose, 40, 'threw up' on Perry, 41, during a wild night out at Melbourne's Grand Hyatt. 
The pair began their night by crashing a high school formal at the hotel, before heading to Spice Market, a nightclub also located within the complex. 
'I spectacularly lost dignity (and keys) one night not too long ago. 
Remember when Katy Perry and I crashed the year 12 formal? 
I don't. 
I had been off the grog for 30 days - my first attempt at sobriety - and I was out partying with Katy,' Rose wrote. 
'What I do remember thinking was: "I'll have a drink tonight, I deserve one. 
I mean, what's the worst that could happen?" 
Well, not stopping at one drink, or ten, and then vomiting on Katy's foot was the answer.' 
Rose went on to insist that 'nothing horrific happened' during the night, and described it as 'one of the best decisions of my life'. 
An article penned by Ruby Rose, 40, (left) more than decade ago has shed new light on the actress' claims Katy Perry, 41, sexually assaulted her at a nightclub in Melbourne, Australia, on August 15, 2010 
Over the weekend, Rose alleged Perry sexually assaulted her that same night while she was 'resting' on a friend's lap. 
Rose claimed she then 'projectile vomited' on the singer. 
She added that it had taken her 'almost two decades' to speak about it. 
'I'm now 40. 
It has taken almost two decades to say this publicly,' she said. 
'Though I am so grateful to have made it long enough to find my voice, it just shows how much of an impact trauma and sexual assault takes. 
Thank you for seeing me.' 
However, a representative for Perry hit back at Ruby's comments in a statement to the Daily Mail, saying: 'The allegations being circulated on social media by Ruby Rose about Katy Perry are not only categorically false, they are dangerous, reckless lies. 
'Ms Rose has a well-documented history of making serious public allegations on social media against various individuals, claims that have repeatedly been denied by those named.' 
Earlier this week, footage of the same evening resurfaced online, showing Perry attending a high school formal to surprise fans. 
Perry entertained her fans by singing a few songs for the crowd, including Single Ladies by Beyoncé. 
While there was no sign of Rose in the footage, Perry later shared an image of them together that night with the caption: 'I crashed a PROM and I liked it.' 
A former manager of the nightclub confirmed Rose and Perry had attended the venue together that night, on August 15, 2010. 
The ex-staffer alleged the stars had 'too much to drink' and were later ushered out of the back door of the club when they left. 
Meanwhile, Victoria Police are now investigating the sexual assault allegations Rose has made against Perry. 
'Melbourne Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT) detectives are investigating a historical sexual assault that occurred in Melbourne in 2010,' a spokesman for the force told Daily Mail on Wednesday. 
'Police have been told the incident occurred at a licensed premises in Melbourne’s CBD.' 
'As the investigation remains ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage,' they added. 
A former manager for Spice Market, which is also located in the Grand Hyatt, confirmed Rose and Perry had attended the venue together that night in 2010 
Rose has since made a post on Threads saying she can no longer talk about the incident while the police investigate her claims. 
'Last update on this: As of this afternoon, I have finalized all of my reports,' the Australian star wrote on Tuesday. 
'This means I am no longer able to comment, repost, or talk publicly about any of those cases, or the individuals involved. 
'It's going to look like I am ignoring everything from supportive messages, to other people's experiences, but I'm not. 
'This is a standard request from the police and in many ways, quite the relief. 
I can start the healing process now. 
And temporary [sic] move forward. 
I love you all so much.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Monique Friedlander: 1.4%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Monique Friedlander: 1.3%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic3.5%This article: 5.5%Monique Friedlander: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.5%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Monique Friedlander: 3.3%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.3%Monique Friedlander: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Monique Friedlander: 1.4%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Monique Friedlander: 2.5%Daily Mail: 12.7%Negativity Bias0.7%This article: 6.5%Monique Friedlander: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias6.5%This article: 2.8%Monique Friedlander: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Monique Friedlander: 2.6%Daily Mail: 4.5%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Monique Friedlander: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias3.5%This article: 2.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Monique Friedlander: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.7%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.2%Monique Friedlander: 3.0%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority15.2%This article: 2.3%Monique Friedlander: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Monique Friedlander: 2.7%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 3.5%Monique Friedlander: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring3.5%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.5%Monique Friedlander: 4.9%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion2.5%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.9%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.3%Monique Friedlander: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.3%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.7%Monique Friedlander: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal8.7%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Monique Friedlander: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Monique Friedlander: 3.9%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 3.7%Monique Friedlander: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.7%This article: 4.5%Monique Friedlander: 3.9%Daily Mail: 9.3%Biased Writer Voice4.5%This article: 1.6%Monique Friedlander: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monique Friedlander: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

750 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers55%attributed speech340writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageRuby Rose • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 12 words • 100.0% coverageRuby Rose • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePerry's representative • 5 words • 100.0% coveragePerry's representative • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePerry • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageVictoria Police • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRuby Rose • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words11% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Perry's representative: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+4.1 ptsWriter: 6.8%Perry's representative: 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer Voice+2.3 ptsWriter: 8.5%Perry's representative: 10.9%10.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.