Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melbourne results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 3,173 hits . Analysis detected 12,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,773 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (24,961 of 35,449 keywords). This Melbourne is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Melbourne
Keyword details
Total words: 14,773
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 21.5% 21.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst