Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ceasefires results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 390 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,266 topics). This Ceasefires is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ceasefires
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 40.0%40.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 25.0%25.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Recency Bias: Topic 40.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing Effect: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos