Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catholic Church Abuse results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 392 hits . Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,933 of 16,562 topics). This Catholic Church Abuse is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Catholic Church Abuse
Topic details
Total words: 2,373
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst