Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video2,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Care Economy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 6,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,843 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,996 of 15,769 topics). This Care Economy is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Care Economy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,843
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos