Topic summary
⁠87%3 analyzed articles/videos1,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Technology results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 916 hits. Analysis detected 7,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,799 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,978 of 16,562 topics). This Car Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Car Technology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,799
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.9%9.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos