Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Capitol Attack results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,031 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Capitol Attack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Capitol Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,031
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.7%27.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos