Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitol results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,029 of 16,559 topics). This Capitol is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Capitol
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos