Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cape Verde results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 150 hits . Analysis detected 686 faulty-reasoning hits from 492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,772 of 16,562 topics). This Cape Verde is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Cape Verde
Topic details
Total words: 492
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.3% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles492 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.5% 30.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst