Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capacity Markets results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 932 hits . Analysis detected 6,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,246 of 16,562 topics). This Capacity Markets is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Capacity Markets
Topic details
Total words: 3,296
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 20.0% 20.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst