Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capacity Markets results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 932 hits. Analysis detected 6,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,246 of 16,562 topics). This Capacity Markets is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Capacity Markets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.4% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos