Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Nowicki results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 932 hits . Analysis detected 6,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (612 of 6,628 authors). This Jerry Nowicki is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Jerry Nowicki
Author details
Total words: 3,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.8% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.5% 9.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.0% 20.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 28.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.0%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst