Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canter’s Deli results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,695 of 16,562 topics). This Canter’s Deli is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Canter’s Deli
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos