Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos765 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canoeing results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 1,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,886 of 16,223 topics). This Canoeing is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Canoeing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos