Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Research results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 1,082 hits. Analysis detected 4,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,830 of 16,562 topics). This Cannabis Research is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Cannabis Research
Topic details
Total words: 3,438
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 31.5%31.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos