Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Addiction results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 652 hits. Analysis detected 6,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (14,467 of 16,562 topics). This Cannabis Addiction is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Cannabis Addiction
Topic details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos