Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Candidate Allegations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 3,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Candidate Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Candidate Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos