Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Canadian Wildfires results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Canadian Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Canadian Wildfires
Topic details
Total words: 1,245
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 28.1%28.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 33.1%33.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.5%7.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos