Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Canadian Screen Awards results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 591 hits. Analysis detected 2,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,330 topics). This Canadian Screen Awards is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Canadian Screen Awards
Topic details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.8%20.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos