Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Canadian Men's National Soccer Team results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 506 hits . Analysis detected 2,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Canadian Men's National Soccer Team is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Canadian Men's National Soccer Team
Topic details
Total words: 3,976
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst