Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Healthcare Policy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 615 hits. Analysis detected 4,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,718 of 16,562 topics). This Canadian Healthcare Policy is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Canadian Healthcare Policy
Topic details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos