Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Governance results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 249 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (974 of 16,562 topics). This Canadian Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Canadian Governance
Topic details
Total words: 249
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
11.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles249 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos