Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canada Men's National Soccer Team results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 5,400 hits . Analysis detected 22,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,218 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,198 of 16,562 topics). This Canada Men's National Soccer Team is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Canada Men's National Soccer Team
Topic details
Total words: 25,218
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.4% 21.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst