Topic summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campus Policies results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 977 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,539 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,095 of 16,562 topics). This Campus Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Campus Policies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,539
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos