OPB4%

Reed College settles antisemitism complaints, updates discrimination policies 28%

By Troy Brynelson90%

7/24/2026, 12:25:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 737 faulty-reasoning hits from 513 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,791 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

Reed College has agreed to update discrimination policies on campus as part of a settlement with a pair of students who complained they were harassed for being Jewish. 
College officials issued a statement Wednesday afternoon and published a lengthy page on its website detailing the legal agreement, which will be in effect for at least three years. 
According to the publicly posted settlement, college officials agreed to make policy changes in exchange for the students dropping their claims. 
The settlement underscores that the college continues to deny any wrongdoing. 
“We remain committed to maintaining a campus environment where every student can learn, live, and participate in college life free from discrimination, harassment, and intimidation,” Sheena McFarland, a college spokesperson, said Thursday. 
“We take concerns about antisemitism, and all forms of unlawful discrimination, seriously, and we will continue to support the well-being, safety, and success of every member of our community,” McFarland said. 
McFarland declined to answer further questions, noting the college’s practice to not comment on legal matters. 
The students who filed complaints  both of whom are Jewish  were represented by a pair of organizations nationally known for combating antisemitism: the Anti-Defamation League and the Louis D. 
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. 
In May 2024, one of the students said her dorm was targeted by pro-Palestine students who were demonstrating on Holocaust Remembrance Day. 
The student said her subsequent complaints to college leaders went largely ignored. 
The student had a traditional mezuzah affixed to her doorframe, signifying a Jewish residence. 
The student found the next morning it had been ripped off and destroyed. 
The student also reported that someone threw a rock through an open window and struck her in the head. 
The student later transferred. 
A second Jewish student had also complained that he was targeted and harassed to the point that he, too, left the campus. 
Under the agreement, signed by Reed officials on July 16, the college agreed to multiple changes over the next three years. 
College officials agreed to make updates to their existing policy to more explicitly protect “both Jewish and Israeli identity,” and to issue a public statement every year for the next three years that the college condemns antisemitism. 
The college will also appoint some staff who have personally dealt with discrimination “based on Jewish or Israeli Protected Categories,” according to the settlement. 
That includes hiring an independent consultant that will be vetted by the Brandeis Center and the ADL. 
Andrew Happy, student president at the college, told OPB that he has concerns if the decision to hire a consultant is made without looping in the student body  including current Jewish students. 
The agreement “has instead led the college to have to consult with an outside group with whom there will certainly be less trust with among the student body,” Happy wrote. 
“I would like clarity on what this collaboration and appended policy will look like and how speech and protest particularly related to Palestinian rights/and or aid by students will be protected.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.1%Troy Brynelson: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 3.7%Associated Press: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Troy Brynelson: 3.1%Associated Press: 2.6%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 4.3%Troy Brynelson: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 1.6%Associated Press: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Troy Brynelson: 23.2%Associated Press: 4.7%Framing Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Troy Brynelson: 0.9%Associated Press: 2.7%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 1.4%Associated Press: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Troy Brynelson: 28.6%Associated Press: 6.2%Negativity Bias16.6%This article: 6.4%Troy Brynelson: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 3.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Troy Brynelson: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.2%In-Group Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.0%Troy Brynelson: 8.6%Associated Press: 3.5%Appeal to Authority15.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.5%Troy Brynelson: 3.2%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization12.5%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.0%Troy Brynelson: 8.0%Associated Press: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion16.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.8%Troy Brynelson: 3.6%Associated Press: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.8%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.5%Troy Brynelson: 9.7%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal10.5%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.8%Troy Brynelson: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.8%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.1%Troy Brynelson: 0.2%Associated Press: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice2.1%This article: 12.3%Troy Brynelson: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Indoctrination12.3%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Troy Brynelson: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

513 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech340writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageSheena McFarland • 32 words • 100.0% coverageMcFarland • 31 words • 100.0% coverageMcFarland • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Happy • 33 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Happy • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Happy • 31 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sheena McFarland

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words18% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sheena McFarland: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Sheena McFarland: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.