Topic summary
⁠89%3 analyzed articles/videos1,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Spending results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,266 hits. Analysis detected 8,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,832 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,925 of 16,102 topics). This Campaign Spending is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Campaign Spending
Topic details
Total words: 5,832
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos