Topic summary
96%3 analyzed articles/videos1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Donations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 4,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,754 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,431 of 16,562 topics). This Campaign Donations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Campaign Donations
Topic details
Total words: 4,754
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate