Topic summary
96% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Donations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 704 hits . Analysis detected 4,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,754 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,431 of 16,562 topics). This Campaign Donations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Campaign Donations
Topic details
Total words: 4,754
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst