Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Campaign Controversies results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Campaign Controversies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Campaign Controversies
Topic details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos