Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camilla results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 1,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,625 of 16,562 topics). This Camilla is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Camilla
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos