Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Governor Election results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 886 hits. Analysis detected 5,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,546 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,135 of 16,558 topics). This California Governor Election is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
California Governor Election
Topic details
Total words: 4,546
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos