Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Regulations results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 7,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 50% (8,284 of 16,562 topics). This Business Regulations is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group. Business Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst