Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Litigation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,862 of 16,562 topics). This Business Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Business Litigation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠59%Business Litigation (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,986
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.1%14.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos