Topic summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 2,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bureaucratic Inefficiency results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,669 hits . Analysis detected 9,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,545 of 16,562 topics). This Bureaucratic Inefficiency is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Bureaucratic Inefficiency
Topic details
Total words: 7,104
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 23.5% 23.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst