Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burbank results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,049 of 15,651 topics). This Burbank is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Burbank
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.9%14.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos