Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bulk Buying results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,397 of 16,562 topics). This Bulk Buying is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Bulk Buying
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos